CONSULTEASE.COM
leadfox728x90

Sign In

Browse By

Counsel was wearing vests while in video conferencing, What high court said?

Case Covered:

Lalaram S/o Shyojiram, By Caste Gurjar

Versus

State Of Rajasthan

Facts of the case:

Learned counsel for the petitioner was contacted through video conferencing he was found to be wearing Baniyan. This court has already observed that during this pandemic where court functioning is being done through video conferencing, lawyers must appear in proper uniform. Even through video conferencing a decorum of the court is required to be maintained. The Advocates Act provides for lawyers to wear a uniform while pleading the case for their clients.

Order:

Keeping in view that the petitioner’s counsel was not in proper uniform, this matter is adjourned.

List this case again on 5th May 2020.

Download the copy:

Counsel was wearing vests while in video conferencing, What high court said?

 

Get unlimited unrestricted access to thousands of insightful content at ConsultEase.
₹149
₹249
₹499
₹699
₹1199
₹1999
payu form placeholder


If you already have a premium membership, Sign In.
Profile photo of ConsultEase Administrator ConsultEase Administrator

Consultant

Faridabad, India

As a Consultease Administrator, I'm responsible for the smooth administration of our portal. Reach out to me in case you need help.

Discuss Now
Opinions & information presented by ConsultEase Members are their own.

hostupon728x90