CONSULTEASE.COM
hostwinds728x90

Sign In

Browse By

Gujarat HC in the case of Nipun Praveen Singhvi Versus State of Gujarat

Case Covered:

Nipun Praveen Singhvi

Versus

State of Gujarat

Facts of the Case:

By means of this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner had prayed for the following reliefs as originally framed:

“(a) Your Lordships may be pleased to pass a Writ of Declaration declaring the constitution of the Gujarat Real Estate Appellate Tribunal as “corn non judice” and violative of Articles 14, 19(1)(g), 21 and 50 of the Constitution of India and Section 43(3) of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 violative of the basic structure of the Constitution and hence void ab initio, in so far as it establishes the Gujarat Real Estate Appellate Tribunal and further contrary to the principles laid down by the Hon’ble Bombay High Court in case of Neelkamal Realtors Suburban Pvt. Ltd. and Anr. vs. Union of India and Ors., 2017 SCC OnLine Bom 9302 and further be pleased to quash and set aside the office Order No.MIS/102016/3281/L dated 11.10.17 passed by the respondent no.1;

(b) Your Lordships may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus, a Writ in the nature of Mandamus and/or any other appropriate writ, order and direction ordering and/or directing the Respondent no.1 to appoint a technical or administrative member of Gujarat Real Estate Appellate Tribunal in accordance with the provisions and applicable rules of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016;

(c) Your Lordships may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus, a Writ in the nature of Mandamus and/or any other appropriate writ, order and direction ordering and/or directing the Respondent no.1 to bring the functioning of the Gujarat Real Estate Appellate Tribunal under the supervision of the Ministry of Law & Justice, Gujarat of Gujarat instead of the Respondent no.1 and further be pleased to direct the Respondent no.1 to provide necessary infrastructure, staff and other facilities including a website for the smooth functioning of the Gujarat Real Estate Appellate Tribunal;”

Observations of the Court:

In effect, the petitioner wants by means of this Public Interest Litigation that the Gujarat Real Estate Appellate Tribunal under the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 be constituted and made functional by appointment of Chairperson, Technical and Administrative Members and also be provided necessary space.

Ms. Manisha Lavkumar Shah learned Government Pleader has placed a note upon instructions with regard to the current status of the selection and appointment and also regarding the space being provided for the said Appellate Tribunal. According to the contents of the said note, the selection of Administrative and Technical Members has already been made by the Selection Committee and further, as far as the Chairperson is concerned, the same is also in advance stage of consultation. With regard to space, it has been stated that sufficient space has been allotted, details of which are mentioned in the note. The contents of note as provided to us are incorporated hereunder:

“The process of the establishment of the Real Estate Appellate Tribunal is on the verge of the completion. As per Section 45 of the RERA Act, the Appellate Tribunal shall consist of a Chairperson and not less than two whole-time Members of which one shall be a Judicial Member and other shall be a Technical or Administrative Member, to be appointed by the appropriate Government.

That, as per Section 46(2) of the RERA Act, The Chairperson of the Appellate Tribunal shall be appointed by the appropriate Government in consultation with the Chief Justice of High Court or his nominee. Whereas, as per Section 46(3) of RERA Act, the Judicial Member and Technical or Administrative Member of the Appellate Tribunal shall be appointed by the appropriate Government on the recommendations of a Selection Committee consisting of the Chief Justice of the High Court or his nominee, the Secretary of the Department handling Housing and the Law Secretary and in such manner as may be prescribed.

In view of the above provisions, the Selection Committee has completed the selection procedure and recommended two names for the post of Judicial Member and two names for the post of Technical or Administrative Member, whereas, for the post of Chairperson of Gujarat Real Estate Appellate Tribunal, the Government is in the process of consultation with the Hon’ble Chief Justice of High Court.

For accommodation of the office of the Gujarat Real Estate Appellate Tribunal, the General Administration Department, State of Gujarat vide its order dated 23.07.2020 has allotted 3378 sq. ft area at Block No.2, D-2 wing, Karmayogi Bhavan, Sector 10, Gandhinagar.”

The decision of the Court:

In view of the above, this Public Interest Litigation does not require any further consideration and accordingly stands disposed of.

We, however, expect the State to make the appointments at the earliest in view of the statement made. Consequently, Civil Application (For Stay) No.1 of 2020 also stands disposed of.

In view of the order passed above, connected petitions which also relate to the same issue namely, Special Civil Application Nos.21314 of 2019 and 21316 of 2019 also stand disposed of along with pending Civil Applications in all the three matters.

Read & Download the full copy in pdf:

Gujarat HC in the case of Nipun Praveen Singhvi Versus State of Gujarat

Get unlimited unrestricted access to thousands of insightful content at ConsultEase.
₹149
₹249
₹499
₹699
₹1199
₹1999
payu form placeholder


If you already have a premium membership, Sign In.
Profile photo of ConsultEase Administrator ConsultEase Administrator

Consultant

Faridabad, India

As a Consultease Administrator, I'm responsible for the smooth administration of our portal. Reach out to me in case you need help.

Discuss Now
Opinions & information presented by ConsultEase Members are their own.

DS Summer Sale 2022 728x90