An Update Regarding Hon’ble Bombay High Court 1. Rule 89(5) – In Shree Traders vs Union of Indian & Ors. (WP No. 12453 of 2019)- The petitioner is engaged in business of supplying goods on online portals such as myntra, flipcart, etc. The charges etc
Due date of filing of GSTR-3B for the month of November 2019 has been extended to 23/12/2019.
ANI has tweeted a document said to be from sources of Government of India. It contains some FAQ’s on NRC. This document has QA’s. Hope this will be helpful.
Introduction of New Returns Scheme: A PPT by CA Vinamar Gupta. In this PPT he has covered the provisions related to new return of GST. You can download it from the following link. 3rd Revised PPT on New Returns Scheme-CA Vinamar Gupta (1)
Notification No. 68/2019 – Central Tax New Delhi, the 13th December, 2019 G.S.R……(E). – In exercise of the powers conferred by
Petitioner can not escape liability where GSTR-1 filed but GSTR 3B not filed Held by Madhya Pradesh High Court in Kabeer Reality (P.) Ltd. On 21-11-19* That filing of GSTR-1 but non filing of 3B has twin impact . One tax does not go to
PART A – Suggestions on IDEAL RETURN FILLING PROCEDURE under GST PART B – SUGGESTIONS for SIMPLIFICATION OF GST LAW & POLICIES PART C – SUGGESTIONS FOR Increase in Government Revenue ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________ PART A – Suggestions on IDEAL RETURN FILLING PROCEDURE which provide ease in return
ALL JOB WORK RATES SUMMARISED – AFTER OCTOBER 2019 NOTIFICATION CHANGED RATES OF JOB WORK JOB WORK RATE 5% – 1.Services by way of JOB WORK OF GOODS BELONGING TO ANOTHER REGISTERED PERSON in relation to- (a) Printing of newspapers; (b) Textiles and textile products falling under Chapter 50
Extension of Date of Filing GSTR 9 and 9C Date for GSTR 9 and 9C for 2017-18 has been extended to 31-1-2020. Earlier Extensions for GSTR 9 and 9C are as under: GSTR-1 Late
It is definitely historic. NCLAT decision held the removal of Cyrus Mistry. Important Excerpts are: “We find certain observations made by the Tribunal against Mr. Cyrus Pallonji Mistry and other Appellants are undesirable and based on extraneously sourced material not on record. It casts impact
