CONSULTEASE.COM
sendx728x90

Sign In

Browse By

“Supreme Court’s Ruling: Clarifying Appeals Deadline”

Background:

  • Refund Claim: M/s. MPPKVV Co. Ltd. sought a refund of INR 3,83,67,782/- for the period between January 20, 1978, and January 07, 1991.
  • Rejection and Appeals: The Assistant Commissioner rejected the refund on December 28, 2017. The Appellant filed a writ petition before the High Court, which was later withdrawn.

Key Issue:

  • Exclusion of Pending Period: Whether the period during which the matter was pending before the High Court could be excluded from the limitation period for filing appeals.

Supreme Court’s Decision:

  • Observations: The Court emphasized the exclusion of the pending period (from March 05, 2018, to March 12, 2018) for the benefit of the Appellant.
  • Extension of Limitation: The Court explained the extension of the limitation period by one month through the proviso to Sub-Section 3A of Section 85 of the Finance Act.
  • Condoning Delay: In the interest of justice, the Court condoned the delay and set aside the Impugned Order of the High Court.

Conclusion:

  • Clarity on Limitation Period: The ruling provides clarity on the limitation period for filing appeals under the Finance Act, 1994, demonstrating the Court’s commitment to fairness and justice.

 

Get unlimited unrestricted access to thousands of insightful content at ConsultEase.
₹149
₹249
₹499
₹699
₹1199
₹1999
payu form placeholder


If you already have a premium membership, Sign In.
Profile photo of ConsultEase Administrator ConsultEase Administrator

Consultant

Faridabad, India

As a Consultease Administrator, I'm responsible for the smooth administration of our portal. Reach out to me in case you need help.

Discuss Now
Opinions & information presented by ConsultEase Members are their own.

hostarmada728x90