GST Litigation: What It Means and How Businesses Can Handle GST Disputes
Learn what GST litigation means, why GST disputes happen, common GST notices, appeal-related issues, and how expert guidance can help businesses respond correctly.
Court denied granting interim relief in West Delhi GST Scam
Case Covered: VIANAAR HOMES PRIVATE LIMITED VERSUS ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER (CIRCLE-12), CENTRAL GOODS & SERVICES TAX & ORS. Facts of the case: The present petition has been placed before this Bench on an urgent basis, as the roster Bench is not available. The petitioner seeks issuance
Nidhi Auto Pvt Ltd Vs. CCE Noida: CENVAT without goods receipt
Case Covered: Nidhi Auto Pvt Ltd Versus C.C.E Noida-I Matter: Revenue contention that Cenvat Credit has been availed without the receipt of the goods. Revenue Investigation: 1. The appellant engaged in the manufacture of Sheet Metal components used for the manufacture of Air conditioners, Refrigerators,
Interest demand stayed by the Rajasthan High court
Case covered: M/s Perfect Turners Versus Union Of India Order: Issue notice. Issue notice of the stay application also. Mr. Kinshuk Jain learned counsel accepts the notices on behalf of the respondents. Learned counsel seeks two weeks’ time to file a reply to the writ
Interest on wrongly paid tax in GST: An analysis
Wrongly paid tax in GST vis a vis interest Place of supply is the base criteria to decide the nature of tax in GST. In many cases, we pay tax under the wrong head. How this wrongly paid tax will be treated? There may be
CA Shafaly GirdharwalProvisional attachment of bank account of assessee merely on the basis of summons was without jurisdiction
Case Covered: Kaish Impex Private Limited Versus The Union of India Facts of the case: The Petitioner has challenged the action of the authorities under the Central Goods and Service Tax, Mumbai of attaching the Petitioner’s bank account in State Bank of India. The Petitioner-Kaish
Stay order on service tax audit by Kolkata high court following interim orders of Delhi & Gujarat HCs.
Case covered: Magma Housing Finance Ltd. Versus Union of India & Ors. Facts of the case: It has been brought to my notice that particular coordinate Bench judgment of Calcutta High Court was referred to by the Division Bench of the Jharkhand High Court wherein
Rule 117 of CGST Rules,2017 is Procedural in nature and is not mandatory.
Case Covered: THE NODAL OFFICER Versus The Goods and Service Tax Council Facts of the case: The present Misc. Civil Applications have been filed by the applicants – original respondents praying for review of the judgment and order dated 06.09.2019 passed by this Court in
Writ Benefit can’t be extended to Indolent Persons who sleep over their Rights and Duties
Case covered: M/s Jagadamba Hardware Stores Versus Union of India Through Deptt. of Central Revenue Facts of the case: Brief facts which led to the filing of the present writ petition is that, the petitioner is a Trader dealing in Pipes, Container Tanks, Pumps, Hardware
Join our litigation course on GST season 2
litigation course on GST We got a tremendous response to our erstwhile course. Now we are in a matured environment. Litigation is taking hold on normal compliances. GST notices are frequent and the department is strict for compliance. In our endeavor to handhold professionals, we
Get recordings of all our webinars: Join CEUU
Join CEUU: What you do in those hours when you feel directionless. Spend your time in sharpening your edges. We have compiled the recordings of all our webinars. These webinars include GST, litigation, income tax and IBC. We will introduce other relevant topics also. Following
Gujarat HC releases Goods detained by the GST Department for want of E-Way Bill
Case covered: M/S HANUMAN TRADING CO. THROUGH PROPRIETOR SANDIP KUMAR Versus STATE OF GUJARAT facts of the case: By this Writ Application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ applicant has prayed for the following reliefs: “(A) This Hon’ble Court may kindly
Bail applications need to be disposed of expeditiously finally-SC
Case covered: MOTAMARRI APPANNA VEERRAJU @ MAV RAJU VERSUS THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL Facts of the case: The High Court for some reason kept the bail application pending from August 2018 and instead passed successive interim orders until 23.11.2019, which are referred to above.