GST Litigation: What It Means and How Businesses Can Handle GST Disputes
Learn what GST litigation means, why GST disputes happen, common GST notices, appeal-related issues, and how expert guidance can help businesses respond correctly.
AAR can decide place of supply also
Case Covered: SUTHERLAND MORTGAGE SERVICES INC Versus THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER Read the full text of the case here. Facts of the case: The case projected in this Writ Petition (Civil) is as follows:- The petitioner, M/s. Sutherland Mortgage Services Inc., now functioning in the office
Sutherland Mortgage Services Inc: Kerala High Court
Citations: Section 2 of the CGST Act Section 8 of the IGST Act Secs.95 to 100 of the CGST Act IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALEXANDER THOMAS MONDAY, THE 03RD DAY OF FEBRUARY 2020 / 14TH MAGHA,
GST ARA order in case M/s. Junior Chamber International India
Case Covered: Junior Chamber International India Facts of the case: The present application was filed under Section 97 of the Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [ hereinafter referred to as ”the CGST Act and MGST Act”] by M/s. Junior Chamber International India, the applicant, seeking
GST ARA order in case M/s. Wise Design Communications Pvt. Ltd
Case Covered: Wise Design Communications Pvt. Ltd Facts of the case: The applicant is engaged in the supply of goods/products for export under the Letter of Undertaking(LUT). These products are advertised on platforms like Google and Facebook apart from other social media platforms of digital
GST ARA order in case of M/s. Las Palmas Co-operative Housing Society Ltd.
Case Covered: Las Palmas Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. Facts of the case: The applicant, a Co-operative Housing Society registered under the Maharashtra Co-operative Housing Society Act, provides various services to its Residents for which members are charged Maintenance charges under various heads like- Service Charges, Electricity
GST ARA order in case of M/s. Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai
Case Covered: Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai Facts of the case: The present application has been filed under Section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017[hereinafter referred to as ”the CGST Act and MGST
Supreme Court has Quashed/Set-aside RBI’ Circular,directing banks to not to deal in crypto currency
Case Covered: INTERNET AND MOBILE ASSOCIATION OF INDIA Versus RESERVE BANK OF INDIA Facts of the case: In case the said enactment (2019) had come through, there would have been an official digital currency, for the creation and circulation of which, RBI/central government would have
GST ARA order in case of M/s Mayank Vinodkumar Jain
Case Covered: M/s. Mayank Vinodkumar Jain Facts of the case: The present application has been filed under Section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017[hereinafter referred to as ”the CGST Act and MGST Act”
Arbitration clause not enforceable if the main instrument is not duly stamped: Supreme Court
Case Covered: M/S DHARMARATNAKARA RAI BAHADUR Versus M/S BHASKAR RAJU & BROTHERS & ORS. Read the full text of the case here. Facts of the case: The facts, in brief, giving rise to the present appeal are as under: The appellant No.1 is a registered Charitable Trust. The rest of the appellants are Trustees of the appellant No.1 – Trust. The appellant No.1 – Trust desired to develop the land owned by it and construct a multipurpose community hall with an office complex. As such, the respondent No.1 offered to develop the said property and also to renovate the Samadhi of the founder of the Trust existing on the said piece of land. Negotiations were held between the appellant No.1 – Trust
M/s Dharmaratnakara Rai V/s. M/s Bhaskar Raju: Supreme Court
Citations: SMS Tea Estates Private Limited vs. Chandmari Tea Company Private Limited Stamp Act, 1899 Registration Act IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No. 1599 OF 2020 (Arising out of SLP(C) No. 7088 of 2015) M/S DHARMARATNAKARA RAI BAHADUR ARCOT NARAINSWAMY MUDALIAR CHATTRAM & OTHER CHARITIES & ORS. …APPELLANT(S) VERSUS M/S BHASKAR RAJU & BROTHERS & ORS. …. RESPONDENT(S) J U D G M E N T Leave granted. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 3. By way of present appeal, the appellants challenge the judgment and order dated 1.12.2014, passed by the single judge of the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore in Civil Miscellaneous Petition No. 167 of 2013 whereby,Justice L.
Rule 86A challenged in Gujarat High court
I am happy to share that in the matter of M/s Jariwala Sales Pvt Ltd Vs Union of India SCA No 5781 of 2020 the petitioner has challenged Rule 86A of the CGST Rules 2017. Hon’ble Gujarat High Court has issued notice to the respondents
GST Registration can be Cancelled for not Furnishing Returns for a continuous period of Six Months: Kerala HC
Case Covered: M/S.PHOENIX RUBBERS Versus THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER Read the full text of the case here. Facts of the case: The factual aspects stated in this Writ Petition (Civil) are as follows:- That the petitioner is an assessee of goods and services tax on