GST Litigation: What It Means and How Businesses Can Handle GST Disputes
Learn what GST litigation means, why GST disputes happen, common GST notices, appeal-related issues, and how expert guidance can help businesses respond correctly.
Karnataka AAR in the case of M/s. WeWork India Management Private Limited
Case Covered: M/s. WeWork India Management Private Limited Facts of the Case: The applicant is a Private Limited Company and is registered under the Goods and Services Act, 2017. The applicant has sought an advance ruling in respect of the following question: a) Whether input
Karnataka HC in the case of M/s. L & T Hydrocarbon Engineering Limited Versus State of Karnataka
Case Covered: M/s. L & T Hydrocarbon Engineering Limited Versus State of Karnataka Facts of the case: The petitioner M/s. L & T Hydrocarbon Engineering Limited Modular fabrication facility, an SEZ Judge Unit in L & T Shipbuilding Limited. The crux of the claim is
Bombay HC in the case of Sahara Hospitality Ltd. vs. The State of Maharashtra
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION AD HOC WP LD-VC NO.112/2020 Sahara Hospitality Ltd. .. Petitioners vs. The State of Maharashtra and Ors. .. Respondents Mr.Gautam Ankhad a/w Mr.Ishaan Patkar a/w Mr.Aditya Chopra a/w Mr.Adesh Agarkar i/b M/s.Victoriam Legalis
Gujarat HC in the case of Hemjay Construction Co. Pvt. Ltd Versus Income Tax Officer
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 19393 of 2018 HEMJAY CONSTRUCTION CO. PVT. LTD THROU DEENABEN YOGESHBHAI SHAH Versus INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 2(2) Appearance: MR DARSHAN B GANDHI(9771) for the PETITIONER(s) No. 1 MR SP MAJMUDAR(3456) for the
Amount Collected From Members as Subscription/ Fees is not Liable to GST
Case Covered: Rotary Club of Mumbai Queens Necklace Facts of the case: This appeal is being filed by the Rotary Club of Mumbai Queens Necklace ( ‘the appellant’ or ‘the club’) against ruling no. GST-ARA-118/2018-19/B-46 dated 30.04.2019 pronounced by Maharashtra Authority for Advance Ruling. The
Raj Quarry works ,AAR Gujarat Royalty to state government is liable for RCM
Case Covered: M/s Raj quarry works The advance ruling of Gujarat Advance ruling authority in case of M/s Raj Quarry Works. Facts of the case The applicant is engaged in the business of mining activity on a plot of land leased from the Govt. of
Maharashtra AAR in the case of Security Printing and Minting Corporation of India Limited
Case Covered: Security Printing and Minting Corporation of India Limited Facts of the case: The present application has been filed under Section 97 of the Central Good and Services Tax Act, 2017, and Maharashtra Good and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as the “CGST Act
Maharashtra AAR in the case of M/s. Panbase Resources Private Limited
Case Covered: M/s. Panbase Resources Private Limited Facts of the case: The present application has been filed under Section 97 of the Central Good and Services Tax Act, 2017, and Maharashtra Good and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as the “CGST Act and MGST
Whether Online Coaching Outside India is Liable for GST?
Case Covered: M/s. Shalini Manish Mittal Facts of the case: The present application has been filed under Section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, and Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act”
Delhi HC in the case of Rehau Polymers Private Limited Versus UOI
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 3824/2020 REHAU POLYMERS PRIVATE LIMITED ….. Petitioner Through: Mr. Abhishek Rastogi, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA THROUGH SECRETARY MINISTRY OF FINANCE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE & ORS. ….. Respondents Through: Mr. Ajay Digpaul, Advocate for
Uttarakhand AAR in the case of M/s. Uttarakhand Forest Development Corporation
Case Covered: M/s. Uttarakhand Forest Development Corporation Facts of the case: This is an application under sub-section (1) of Section 97 of the CGST/SGST Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as Act) and rules made thereunder filed by M/s. Uttarakhand Forest Development Corporation, 73-Nehru Road, Dehradun, Uttarakhand
Gujarat AAR in the case of M/s. Jay Jalaram Enterprises
Case Covered: M/s. Jay Jalaram Enterprises Facts of the case: The applicant has submitted that they are a proprietorship concern and manufacture Pop Corn, which is sold in a sealed plastic bag bearing a registered brand name as [J.J.’s] POPCORN, under the Trade Marks Act,