GST Litigation: What It Means and How Businesses Can Handle GST Disputes
Learn what GST litigation means, why GST disputes happen, common GST notices, appeal-related issues, and how expert guidance can help businesses respond correctly.
Andhra Pradesh AAR in the case of M/s. Master Minds
Case Covered: M/s. Master Minds Facts of the case: The applicant herein is a proprietary firm and a leading educational institution providing coaching to students for chartered Accountancy certificate (‘CA’); Cost and Works Accountancy Certificate (‘ICWA) and Intermediate Certificate. The coaching provided by the applicant
Gujarat HC in the case of Hitech Projects Pvt. Ltd. Versus Union of India
Case Covered: Hitech Projects Pvt. Ltd. Versus Union of India Facts of the Case: The writ applicant No.1 is a company engaged in the work of civil construction since 1996-97. It appears from the materials on the record that a show-cause notice No.V.38/15-54/OA/2016 dated 02.05.2016
12% GST on Interest or Penalty Charged by Chit Fund Company
Case Covered: M/s. Ushabala Chits Private Limited Facts of the Case: The applicant is a company, engaged in conducting chit auctions for the past 36 years and is one of the longest-standing organizations. They register the members and conduct auction in respect of each chit
West Bengal AAR in the case of M/s IZ-Kartex named after PG Korobkov Ltd
Case Covered: M/s IZ-Kartex named after PG Korobkov Ltd Facts of the case: The applicant is the local branch of a Russian business entity by the same name (hereinafter „Foreign Company‟), which entered into a Maintenance and Repair Contract (hereinafter called “MARC”) with Bharat Coking
Delhi HC in the case of Clean Wind Power Kurnool Private Limited
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 3902/2020 & CM APPL. 13961/2020 CLEAN WIND POWER KURNOOL PRIVATE LIMITED ….. Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajat Mittal, Advocate with Mr. B.L. Goyal, Advocate versus THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX TDS CIRCLE 73 1 &
Refund Can be Granted When The DBK Was Claimed and Refunded
Case Covered: M/s. Precot Meridian Limited Versus The Commissioner of Customs Facts of the Case: The present Writ Petition has been filed seeking for a Writ of Mandamus, directing the second respondent to sanction and to refund the amount of Rs.4,80,355/- [Rupees Four Lakhs and
Calcutta HC in the case of J. S. Pigments Private Ltd. Versus The State of West Bengal
In the High Court At Calcutta Civil Appellate Jurisdiction Appellate Side Present: The Hon’ble Justice Samapti Chatterjee And The Hon’ble Justice Hiranmay Bhattacharyya MAT 460 of 2020 CAN 3513 of 2020 CAN 3526 of 2020 ( CAN 3526 of 2020 is not lying with the
M/s. Commercial Steel Co. V/s ASC Sales Tax
M/s. Commercial Steel Co. v/s ASC Sales Tax Writ Petition No. 2161 of 2020, Dt 04 March 2020 At, High Court of for the State of Telangana Judgment Text 1. The petitioner herein is a proprietary concern engaged in the business of Iron and Steel
Maharashtra AAR in the case of Portescap India Private Limited
Case Covered: Portescap India Private Limited Facts of the case: The present application has been filed under Section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, and Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and the MGST Act”
Maharashtra AAR in the case of M/s. Ashish Arvind Hansoti
Case Covered: M/s. Ashish Arvind Hansoti Facts of the case: The present application has been filed under Section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, and Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and the MGST Act”
Maharashtra AAR in the case of Lear India Engineering LLP
Case Covered: Lear India Engineering LLP Facts of the case: The present application has been filed under Section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, and Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and the MGST Act”
Maharashtra AAR in the case of A Raymond Fasteners India Pvt. Ltd
Case Covered: A Raymond Fasteners India Pvt. Ltd facts of the case: The present application has been filed under section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and