GST Litigation: What It Means and How Businesses Can Handle GST Disputes
Learn what GST litigation means, why GST disputes happen, common GST notices, appeal-related issues, and how expert guidance can help businesses respond correctly.
SOP On Circular Dated 16.04.2021
C I R C U L A R The Hon’ble the Chief Justice and other Hon’ble Judges of the Hon’ble Administrative Committee, after taking into account the exponential surge in COVID-19 cases and the views of stakeholders have been pleased to put in place the
Functioning of all the Courts in pursuance to the Circular dated 16.04.2021 w.e.f. 19.04.2021.
To, ALL the Principal District & Sessions Judges / Heads of the Establishment Subject: Functioning of all the Courts in pursuance to the Circular dated 16.04.2021 w.e.f. 19.04.2021. Sir / Madam, With reference to the subject noted above, I am directed to inform you that
Extension of Interim Order 16.04.2021
Case Covered: Court On Its Own Motion Order: The second wave of the pandemic, arising out of the COVID-19 virus has been wreaking havoc just as the first wave did in the year that went by. To combat the rising second wave, the Government of
Supreme Court to Hear only Urgent Matters from 22 April, 2021 due to surge in Covid-19 Cases.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Circular In continuation of Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) dated 04.07.2020 and circular(s) issued earlier regarding mentioning of matter(s), it is hereby notified for the information of all concerned: (a) only urgent matters will be listed for hearing w.e.f. 22.04.2021. and (b)
Jurisprudence on Provisional Attachment of Bank Account
Hon’ble Supreme Court in M/s Radha Krishan Industries Versus State Of Himachal Pradesh & Ors. Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution is maintainable in case of Provisional Attachment in spite of alternate remedy to file an appeal. The power to levy a
Supreme Court Judgment in the case of M/s Radha Krishan Industries V/s. State of Himachal Pradesh
Case Covered: M/s Radha Krishan Industries Versus State of Himachal Pradesh Facts of the Case: This appeal raises significant issues of public importance, engaging as it does, the interface between citizens and their businesses with the fiscal administration. Legislation enacted for the levy of goods
Input Tax Credit availed by Buyer, Tax not paid by Supplier, Recovery Proceedings quashed against Buyer, Remitted Back to Officer
2021 (3) TMI 1020 – Madras High Court in M/S. D.Y. Beathel Enterprises Versus The State Tax Officer (Data Cell), (Investigation Wing) Commercial Tax Buildings, Tirunelveli. Facts 1. Petitioner had purchased goods from one Charles and his wife Shanthi. 2. The petitioners herein availed input
Allahabad HC in the case of Bharat Forge Limited
Case Covered: Bharat Forge Limited Versus The Principal Chief Materials Manager Diesel Locomotive Works Facts of the Case: The petitioner herein is a company registered under the provisions of the Indian Companies Act having its registered office at Pune Cantonment, Mundhwa, Pune, Maharashtra. Respondent no.1,
System of Hearing of Matters Before Delhi HC With Effect From 19.04.2021
Office Order SUB: SYSTEM OF HEARING OF MATTERS BEFORE DELHI HIGH COURT WITH EFFECT FROM 19.04.2021 In continuation of this Court’s Office Order No.223/RG/DHC/2021 dated 8.4.2021, keeping in view the alarming rise in the Covid-19 cases in the NCT of Delhi, it has been ordered
Gujarat AAR in the case of M/s. I-tech Plast India Pvt. Ltd.
Case Covered: M/s. I-tech Plast India Pvt. Ltd. Facts of the Case: The applicant M/s. I-tech Plast India Pvt.Ltd., Survey No.108-109, Bhavnagar-Rajkot Highway, Shampara, Bhavnagar is engaged in the business of manufacturing and supply of toys made up of plastic and/or rubber or both wherein
Orissa HC in the case of M/s Indian Farmers Fertilizers Co-Operative Ltd. Vs UOI
Case Covered: M/s Indian Farmers Fertilizers Co-operative Ltd Vs Union of India Order: 1. This matter is taken up by video conferencing mode. 2. On the previous date, the Court had passed the following order: “Heard Mr. P.K. Jena, learned counsel for the Petitioner and
Delhi HC in the case of Del Small Ice Cream Manufacturers Welfare’s Association (Reg.)
Case Covered: Del Small Ice Cream Manufacturers Welfare’s Association (Reg.) Versus Union of India Facts of the Case: The petitioner, claiming to represent the interest of more than 50 small scale ice cream manufacturing units operating in the National Capital Territory of Delhi has filed



