GST Litigation: What It Means and How Businesses Can Handle GST Disputes
Learn what GST litigation means, why GST disputes happen, common GST notices, appeal-related issues, and how expert guidance can help businesses respond correctly.
GST LitigationCourt distributed the seized concentrators to police and judges
FIR No. 917/21 PS: Dwarka South U/s:- 3/7 Essential Commodities Act, 3 Epidemic Act & 420/269/188/120 B/ 34 IPC State Vs Vinay Agarwal & Akash Vashist The urgent hearing of the application was conducted from my residence through Video conferencing Via the CISCO WEBEX meeting,
GST LitigationSC Order in the case of The Chief Election Commissioner of India Versus M.R Vijayabhaskar
Case Covered: The Chief Election Commissioner of India Versus M.R Vijayabhaskar Facts of the Case: A delicate question of balancing the powers of two constitutional authorities in this appeal has raised larger issues of the freedom of speech and expression of the media, the right
GST LitigationSupreme Court in the case of Forum for People’s Collective Efforts (FPCE) Versus The State of West Bengal
Case Covered: Forum for People’s Collective Efforts (FPCE) Versus The State of West Bengal Facts of the Case: The constitutional validity of the West Bengal Housing Industry Regulation Act, 2017 (“WB-HIRA”/the “State enactment”) is challenged in a petition under Article 32. The basis of the
GST LitigationSupreme Court in the case of Dr. Jaishri Laxmanrao Patil Versus The Chief Minister
Case Covered: Dr. Jaishri Laxmanrao Patil Versus The Chief Minister Facts of the Case: This Constitution Bench has been constituted to consider questions of seminal importance relating to contours and extent of special provisions for the advancement of socially and educationally backward class (SEBC) of
GST LitigationOrissa HC Order in the case of M/s. Shree Gobind Alloys Pvt. Ltd. V/s. UOI
Case Covered: M/s.Shree Gobind Alloys Pvt. Ltd. Versus Union of India Order of the Hon’ble Court: 1. This matter is taken up by video conferencing mode. 2. Issue notice. 3. Mr. P.K. Parhi, learned Assistant Solicitor General accepts notice on behalf of Opposite Party No.1.
GST LitigationMadras HC Order in the case of Mrs.Saraspathy Sundaraj Versus The Assistant Commissioner
Case Covered: Mrs.Saraspathy Sundaraj Versus The Assistant Commissioner Facts of the Case: The petitioner is aggrieved against the attachment created in her property situated in Survey No.156/1 and 156/2, T.S.No.6056, Block No.135, Theyagaraya Nagar Division, measuring 5623 sq. ft, New Door No.11, Old Door No.29,
GST LitigationMadras HC in the case of M/s.Chaizup Beverages LLP Versus The Assistant Commissioner
Case Covered: M/s.Chaizup Beverages LLP Versus The Assistant Commissioner Facts of the Case: These Writ Petitions challenge appellate orders dated 12.05.2020 passed by R2 confirming the rejection of the refunds claimed by the petitioner. The rejection is confirmed taking note of paragraph 2.5 of Board’s
GST LitigationManish & Anr. V/s. DGGI Bail Order
Case Covered: Manish & Anr. Versus DGGI, Gurugram Zonal Unit Order: This is a joint application for bail under Section 437 Cr.P.C. moved on behalf of applicants /accused persons namely Manish and Vikas through Ld. Counsel. It is argued by Ld. Counsel for applicants/accused persons
GST LitigationSupreme Court in the case of Corporation Bank Versus M/s. Saraswati Abharansala
Case Covered: Corporation Bank Versus M/s. Saraswati Abharansala Facts of the Case: The first respondent is a dealer in bullion gold. It entered into transactions of purchase of gold from the appellant herein during the period 6th April 1999 and 10th December 1999. The total
GST LitigationBefore denying credit to the buyer, catch/enquire the Supplier at first place
Input Tax Credit – Section 16 of CGST Act – Non-Payment Of Tax By Supplier Before denying credit to the buyer, catch/enquire the Supplier at first place – Madras High Court 1. Section 16(2)(c) of the CGST Act, provides that tax has been actually paid
GST LitigationSupreme Court Order in the case of Manoj Kumar Sood Versus State of Jharkhand
Case Covered: Manoj Kumar Sood Versus State of Jharkhand Order: This Special Leave Petition is against the order dated 27.07.2020 in B.A.No.4646 of 2020 passed by the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi insofar as the petitioner has been granted bail, subject inter-alia to the
GST LitigationHimachal Pradesh HC in the case of M/s GM Powertech Versus State of H.P
Case Covered: M/s GM Powertech Versus State of H.P Order: The order(s) of assessment made by the assessing authority, and, appertaining to GST levies, stand respectively embodied in Annexure(s) P-6 and P-7. However, the afore orders of assessment of GST, is, assailed through the instant