Expert Knowledge,
Straight from Practitioners.
Tax tips, legal guides, and financial advice written by the same verified CAs, Advocates, and Advisors you can consult on ConsultEase.
Attachment should be done only when it is necessary for protection of revenue (Pdf Attach)
Cases Covered: REDAMANCY WORLD Versus ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR GENERAL Facts of the cases : The petitioner became aware that its bank account was directed to be frozen by an communication dated 29.04.2019 (Letter No.DGGI/GZU/INV/Gr-E/REDAMANCY/191/2018-19) from a letter dated 24.05.2019, issued by Canara Bank, sent in response
CA Shafaly GirdharwalHigh court give bail for ITC from a fake Supplier.
Cases Covered: ARVINDBHAI BALUBHAI VORA Versus STATE OF GUJARAT Citation: Sanjay Chandra v. Central Bureau of Investigation Facts of the Cases: The petitioner engaged in the procurement of goods and duly claimed input tax credit. However, allegations surfaced regarding the legitimacy of the supplier’s registration,
Deptt cant reverse ITC ignoring the fact that form was not available on the Portal (Pdf Attach)
Cases Covered: M/S Tikona Infinet Private Limited vs State of U.P. and Another Facts of the case The petitioner is a registered Company engaged in providing internet service across India from various State including the State of U.P. The petitioner entered into a Business Transfer
CA Shafaly GirdharwalMere payment via bank account wont make ITC eligible- Aastha Enterprises (PDF)
Cases Covered: M/s Aastha Enterprises VS State of Bihar through the Commissioner of Commercial State Taxes Citation: Sri Vinayaga Agencies v. The Assistant Commissioner (CT) & Anr. M/s D.Y. Beathel Enterprises v. The State Tax Officer ALD. Automotive Pvt. Ltd. v. The Commercial Tax Officer
CA Shafaly GirdharwalBombay HC in the case of N Sampath Ganesh Versus Union Of India
Case Covered: N Sampath Ganesh Versus Union Of India Facts of the case: A prayer made under S. 140(5) of the Companies Act,2013 or 2013 Act against the statutory auditors by the Union of India through Ministry of the Corporate Affairs (MCA) in an investigation/dispute
NCLAT Confirms Penalty on Adani Gas for Abuse of Dominant Position
Case Covered: M/s Adani Gas Limited Versus Competition Commission of India Read the full text of the case here. Facts of the case: ‘Adani Gas Limited’ (AGL) has preferred the instant appeal being appeal No. TA (AT) (Competition) No. 33 of 2017, Old Appeal No.
M/s Adani Gas Limited : NCLAT Delhi
Citations: Shri Balaganesan Metals Vs. M N Shanmugham Chetty & Ors Excel Crop Care Ltd. Vs. Competition Commission of India & Anr Aero Traders (P) Ltd. Vs. Ravinder Kumar Suri NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI TA (AT) (Competition) No. 33 of 2017
Non-Executive Directors of Company immune from Cheque Dishonour Proceedings: Delhi HC
Case Covered: SUNITA PALTA & ORS Versus M/S KIT MARKETING PVT LTD Facts of the case: The present proceedings are instituted under Section 482 Cr.P.C challenging the order dated 14.02.2017 passed by the Metropolitan Magistrate in CC No.874/2017 whereby the present petitioners were summoned for
SUNITA PALTA & ORS: Delhi High Court
Citations: S.M.S. Pharmaceuticals Ltd. v. Neeta Bhalla K.K. Ahuja v. V.K. Vora Pooja Ravinder Devidasani v. State of Maharashtra and Anr. Girdhari Lal Gupta Vs. D.H. Mehta & Anr. Nandakumar & Ors. v. M/s ECE Industries Ltd. Chintalapati Srinivasa Raju v. Securities and Exchange
Cyrus Investments Private Limited & Another v. Tata Sons Limited & Others: NCLT case
Case Covered: Cyrus Investments Private Limited & Another Versus Tata Sons Limited & Others Case Summary: The National Company Law Tribunal, Mumbai Bench (“NCLT”) delivered a landmark decision in the case of Cyrus Investments Private Limited. & Another (“Petitioners”) v. Tata Sons Limited & Others1
Cyrus Vs. Tata: Download 172 pages decision of NCLAT
It is definitely historic. NCLAT decision held the removal of Cyrus Mistry. Important Excerpts are: “We find certain observations made by the Tribunal against Mr. Cyrus Pallonji Mistry and other Appellants are undesirable and based on extraneously sourced material not on record. It casts impact
NCLAT restored Cyrus Mistry as Chairman of TATA Group
NCLAT has restored the Cyrus Mistry as Chairman of TATA Group. This can be seen as a big win for Cyrus. He was removed from the position in 2016. Earlier order find his removal fair but this one will definitely be a relief. Although it