GST Litigation: What It Means and How Businesses Can Handle GST Disputes
Learn what GST litigation means, why GST disputes happen, common GST notices, appeal-related issues, and how expert guidance can help businesses respond correctly.
Gujarat AAR in the case of M/s. Jain Dairy Products Pvt. Ltd.
Case Covered: M/s. Jain Dairy Products Pvt. Ltd. Facts of the Case: The applicant is doing business of manufacturing and selling of products of paneer, cheese and other milk products and also trading of other food items. They are registered under the GST Act, 2017.
Delhi HC in the case of Dhruv Krishan Maggu Versus Union of India
Case Covered: Dhruv Krishan Maggu Versus Union of India & Ors. Facts of the Case: While the CM No. 32276/2020 has been filed by the Petitioner in W.P.(C.) No. 10130/2020 seeking interim protection, CM No. 28105/2020 has been filed by Respondent nos. 2 and 3
Bombay HC in the case of AJE India Private Limited Versus Union of India
Case Covered: AJE India Private Limited Versus Union of India Facts of the Case: By filing this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks to quash the order dated 18th/19th November 2020 passed by respondent No.2 provisionally attaching the bank
Delhi HC in the case of Proex Fashion Private Limited Versus Government of India
Case Covered: Proex Fashion Private Limited Versus Government of India Facts of the Case: By way of the present petition, the petitioner seeks to challenge a communication dated 25.11.2020/01.12.2020 (Annexure-9 to the writ petition), by which the bank account of the petitioner in the respondent
[Read Order] Gujrat High Court Directed to Extend The Due Dates
Case Covered: The All Gujrat Federation of Tax Consultants Versus Union of India Facts of the Case: By this writ application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ applicants have prayed for the following relief: “The petitioners, therefore, prays that this Hon’ble Court is pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or a writ in the nature of mandamus or a writ of certiorari or a writ in the nature of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, direction or order and be pleased to (a) direct the respondent No.2 henceforth not make any alternations in Forms and Utilities or changes in tax compliance requirements, after the beginning of the Assessment year in which the same are made applicable; providing the taxpayers and the tax practitioners a clear period of 183 and 214 days to prepare and
Delhi HC in the case of Pacific Projects Limited Versus Asstt CIT
Case Covered: Pacific Projects Limited Versus Asstt CIT Facts of the Case: The present writ petition has been filed challenging the order dated 29th July 2019 passed by the ITAT dismissing the miscellaneous application filed by the petitioner/assessee under Section 254(2) for recall of the
Allahabad HC in the case of Nitin Verma Versus The state of U.P.
Case Covered: Nitin Verma Versus The state of U.P. Facts of the Case: This anticipatory bail application has been filed praying for a grant of anticipatory bail to the applicant with reference to summon/notice dated 30.01.2020 issued by Superintendent (A.E.) C.G.S.T. & Central Excise, Agra
[Justin- Notice by Supreme Court] Gujarat High Court Ocean Freight Matters allowing the petitions and pronouncing levy to be ultra vires.
Latest Update: UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following ORDER The Supreme court has issued a notice in this case. We have heard Mr. N Venkatraman and Mr. K M Nataraj, learned Additional Solicitor Generals, appearing on behalf of the petitioners, and Mr.
CA Shafaly GirdharwalSupreme Court in the case of Rajeev Suri Versus Delhi Development Authority
Case Covered: Rajeev Suri Versus Delhi Development Authority Facts of the Case: By these petition(s)/appeal(s)/case(s), we are called upon by the petitioners to undertake a comprehensive and heightened judicial scrutiny regarding the permissibility of the Central Vista Project1 of the Government of India. Diverse issues
Violation of Natural Justice, Petitioner Plea Rejected Without Any Reasons
Violation of Natural Justice, Petitioner Plea Rejected Without Any Reasons 2021 (1) TMI 59 – Madras High Court in M/S. Sangeeteha Match Works, Versus The State Tax Officer (Inspection Cell), Virudhunagar. Facts In respect of the assessment year 2017-2018, there were 33 defects in the
CESTAT in the case of M/s Honda Cars India Ltd.
Case Covered: M/s Honda Cars India Ltd. Versus The Commissioner, Central Excise and Service Tax Facts of the Case: M/s Honda Cars India Ltd. has sought the quashing of the order dated January 23, 2015, passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise and Service Tax, New
Allahabad HC in the case of M/s Ratan Industries Limited
Case Covered: M/s Ratan Industries Limited Versus The State Of U.P. Facts of the Case: The present petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging the order dated 24.1.2019 passed by respondent no. 3, whereby a tax demand of Rs. 91,450/- and interest thereon has