GST Litigation: What It Means and How Businesses Can Handle GST Disputes
Learn what GST litigation means, why GST disputes happen, common GST notices, appeal-related issues, and how expert guidance can help businesses respond correctly.
Karnataka HC in the case of Mr. Virendra Khanna Versus State of Karnataka
Case Covered: Mr. Virendra Khanna Versus State of Karnataka Facts of the Case: In the petition, it is contended that: The petitioner is an IT Engineer, having studied in M/s RV College of Engineering, Banglore. He was selected as Software Engineer, during the process of
Tripura HC in the case of Tirthamoyee Aluminium Products Versus State of Tripura
Case Covered: Tirthamoyee Aluminium Products Versus State of Tripura Facts of the Case: Brief facts are as under: Petitioner is a proprietary concern and is engaged in the business of manufacturing aluminum utensils and its unit is located at Agartala. The petitioner purchased certain aluminium
Delhi HC in the case of Air Customs Versus Begaim Akynova
Case Covered: Air Customs Versus Begaim Akynova Order of the Hon’ble Court: Be that as it may, the same itself does not suffice for the learned counsel who put in an appearance even on behalf of the Department of Customs on 06.01.2021 before the learned
Bail Petition Accepted- Petitioner compliance to Summons, No Tampering of Evidence, Section 167 of Cr. Pc
Bail Petition Accepted- Petitioner compliance to Summons, No Tampering of Evidence, Section 167 of Cr. Pc 2021 (3) TMI 541 – Bombay High Court in Sunil Kumar Jha And Akshay Chhabra Versus Union Of India & Ors. The allegation against the Petitioner Petitioners have committed
Delhi HC in the case of Karan Singh Versus Designated Committee Sabka Vishwas Legacy Dispute Resolution Scheme
Case Covered: Karan Singh Versus Designated Committee Sabka Vishwas Legacy Dispute Resolution Scheme Facts of the Case: The Petitioner, aggrieved with the rejection of its declaration under the amnesty scheme – Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 [hereinafter referred to as ‘SVLDRS’] for settlement
Supreme Court Ends ‘Extension Of Limitation’
Supreme Court Ends ‘Extension Of Limitation’ SUO MOTO WRIT (CIVIL) NO. 3 OF 2020 IN RE: COGNIZANCE FOR EXTENSION OF LIMITATION It is needless to point out that the law of limitation finds its root in two Latin maxims, one of which is ‘Vigilantibus Non-Dormientibus
Bombay HC in the case of BA Continuum India Pvt. Ltd. Versus Union of India
Case Covered: BA Continuum India Pvt. Ltd. Versus Union of India Facts of the Case: In this petition filed under Articles 226 / 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has assailed legality and correctness of five identical orders all dated 26.06.2020 passed by
Gujarat HC in the case of M/s Deepak Print Versus Union of India
Case Covered: M/s Deepak Print Versus Union of India Facts of the Case: By this writ application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ applicant has prayed for the following reliefs; “(A) To admit and allow this petition; (B) To issue any
SC Order In Re: Cognizance For Extension of Limitation
In Re: Cognizance For Extension of Limitation. Order: Due to the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, this Court took suo moto cognizance of the situation arising from difficulties that might be faced by the litigants across the country in filing petitions/applications/suits/appeals/all other proceedings within the
Allahabad HC in the case of Awadh Bar Association Versus Union of India
Case Covered: Awadh Bar Association Versus Union of India Order: At the threshold, it is stated by the learned Additional Solicitor General of India that respondent nos. 1 and 2 have taken a decision to file a Special Leave Petition to assail the correctness of
Withholding of Refund Order was Quashed as no Reasons of Fraud or Malfeasance
Withholding of Refund Order was Quashed as no Reasons of Fraud or Malfeasance 2021 (2) TMI 924 – Allahabad High Court in M/S Bushrah Export House Thru Sole Prop. Asif Ali Versus U.O.I. Thru Secy. Finance Ministry Revenue Deptt. & Ors. Facts of the Case
Gujarat HC in the case of Basant Pherumal Makhija Versus State of Gujarat
Case Covered: Basant Pherumal Makhija Versus State of Gujarat Issue: The applicant was arrested on 09.12.2020, for the allegations of total evasion of GST and disposing of the manufactured goods without showing any record about its manufacturing activity and has applied for regular bail. Brief