GST Litigation: What It Means and How Businesses Can Handle GST Disputes
Learn what GST litigation means, why GST disputes happen, common GST notices, appeal-related issues, and how expert guidance can help businesses respond correctly.
GST LitigationGujarat HC in the case of Messrs Vishnu Aroma Pouching Pvt Ltd Versus Union Of India
Case Covered: Messrs Vishnu Aroma Pouching Pvt Ltd Versus Union Of India Facts of the Case: By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners seek the following substantive reliefs:- “16. In the above premises, the petitioners most respectfully pray as
GST LitigationTripura HC Order in the case of Shri Sentu Dey Versus The State of Tripura
Case Covered: Shri Sentu Dey Versus The State of Tripura Facts of the Case: The petitioner has challenged an order dated 02.01.2021 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Bishalgarh under which he has sent a criminal case CR 03 of 2020 for investigation
SC levied Penalty of Rs. 25000 on Deptt in Vishnu Aroma Pouching P Ltd Vs UOI
The penalty of Rs. 25000 on Deptt A penalty of Rs. 25000 on deptt is levied by the SC in case of Vishnu Aroma Pouching P Ltd Vs. UOI. The taxpayer won the case back in 2019. But the department went to file an SLP
CA Shafaly Girdharwal
GST LitigationDelhi HC in the case of Anju Jalaj Batra Versus National E-Assessment Centre
Case Covered: Anju Jalaj Batra Versus National E-Assessment Centre Additional Joint Deputy Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Officer. Facts of the Case: The petition has been heard by way of video conferencing. The present writ petition has been filed challenging assessment order dated 22nd April
GST LitigationInterim restraining order against Sec 194N (TDS provision on cash withdrawal )
Tax Deduction at Source (TDS) under section 194N of the Income Tax Act, 1961 mandated banks, cooperative banks, and post offices to deduct a TDS @ 2% on every withdrawal in excess of one crore rupees during the previous year made by any person (herein
GST LitigationAllahabad HC Order in the case of M/s Jindal Pipes Limited Versus The State Of U.P.
Case Covered: M/s Jindal Pipes Limited Versus The State Of U.P. Order of the Hon’ble Court: Counter affidavit has been filed by the learned Standing Counsel. The same be kept on record. Learned counsel for the petitioner, however, does not wish to file a rejoinder
GST LitigationDelhi HC order in the case of PCIT V/s M/s Brahma Centre Development Pvt. Ltd.
Case covered: Principal Commissioner of Income Tax Versus M/s Brahma Centre Development Pvt. Ltd. Facts of the case: The above-captioned appeals are directed against the common order dated 18.12.2019, passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal [in short “Tribunal”] in ITA Nos. 4341/Del/2019 and 4342/Del/2019,
GST LitigationKarnataka AAR Ruling in the case of Airbus Group India Private Limited
Case Covered: Airbus Group India Private Limited Facts of the case: M/s Airbus Group India Private Limited, (hereinafter referred to as the Applicant ‘or’ Airbus India ‘or the Company’), 4 & 4A, XYLEM, 4th Floor, Dyavasandra Industrial Area, Mahadevapura Post, Bengaluru 560048, Karnataka having GSTIN
GST LitigationHaryana AAR Order In the Case of M/s Sachdeva Colleges Limited
Case Covered: M/s Sachdeva Colleges Limited Facts of the Case: M/s Sachdeva college Ltd. is a Limited company incorporated under the Companies Act (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Applicant”) having its Regd. office at 29, South Patel Nagar, New Delhi-110008. (i) The applicant is providing
GST LitigationMadras HC in the case of M/s. ARS Steels & Alloy International Pvt. Ltd
Case covered: M/s. ARS Steels & Alloy International Pvt. Ltd Versus The State Tax Officer Common Order: This batch of Writ Petitions relates to two sets of assessment orders passed in the case of two assessees under the provisions of Goods and Services Tax Act,
GST LitigationConstitutional Validity of the Provision levying GST on the supply of Business Promotion Services to the Recipient located Outside India By Justice Abhay Ahuja
2021 (6) TMI 383 – Bombay High Court in Dharmendra M. Jani Versus Union of India and Others Facts Petitioner provides marketing and sales promotion services to customers/principals located outside India who in turn export goods to importers in India on the basis of
GST LitigationBail Once Granted cannot be Cancelled in Mechanical Manner
2021 (6) TMI 516 – Delhi High Court in Central Goods and Service Tax Delhi East Versus Sh. Naval Kumar &Ors. Allegation. 1. M/s Milkfood Limited is at the center of this network and has availed huge ITC from firms that have been proved to