2021 (7) TMI 998 – Gujarat High Court in M/S Sushant Steel Through Proprietor Vinod Kumar Nagina Gupta Versus State Of Gujarat
Department has attached the movable and immovable properties to the tune of ₹ 75,48,541/-, which include the attachment of two bank accounts
Petitioner has already deposited the amount of deposit for filing the appeal under section 107 of the said Act
The Court is of the opinion that the interest of the Revenue would still remain substantially protected even if, at present, without going into the merits of the case, the provisional attachment in respect of two bank accounts is removed. It may be noted that the
The provisional attachment in respect of the two immovable properties shall continue.
Movable and Immovable Property
Recieve the most important tips and updates
Absolutely Free! Unsubscribe anytime.
We adhere 100% to the no-spam policy.