CONSULTEASE.COM

Sign In

Browse By

Delhi HC in the case of Ankit Bindal Versus Pr. Commissioner of Central Goods And Services Tax

Case Covered:

Ankit Bindal

Versus

Pr. Commissioner of Central Goods And Services Tax Delhi North

Order of the Hon’ble Court:

Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, who appears for the petitioners, says that the summons has been issued to the petitioners which are not only vague but also seek self-incriminating material from them.

Mr. Bhatia, inter alia, stresses the point, that, in the summons, bank statements have been called for without specifying the relevant period for which the same need to be furnished. Besides this, the petitioners have been called to tender a ‘voluntary statement´.

Mr. Harpreet Singh, who appears on advance notice, on behalf of the respondents says, he will obtain instructions in the matter.

Furthermore, for the moment, the concerned officer will defer the enforcement of the direction issued requiring the appearance of the petitioners before him, to a date beyond the next date fixed before this Court.

List the matter on 12.04.2021.

Read the Order:

Delhi HC in the case of Ankit Bindal Versus Pr. Commissioner of Central Goods And Services Tax.

Profile photo of Consultease Administrator Consultease Administrator

Consultant

Faridabad, India

As a Consultease Administrator I'm responsible for smooth administration of our portal. Reach out to me in case you need help.

Discuss Now
Opinions & information presented by ConsultEase Members are their own.